Legal Opinion

Costlo v. Sturm

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1948No. 144PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By THE COURT:

Submitted on motion of plaintiff-appellant for an extension of time within which to file briefs, and, also on the motion of defendant-appellee, Luetta Keplinger Sturm, to dismiss the appeal on the following grounds:

“Plaintiff-appellant failed to file his assignments of error and brief within fifty days after the date of filing his notice of intention to appeal, and for failure to file his motion for extension of time within the fifty day period.”

The record shows that notice of intention to appeal on questions of law was filed on July 12. 1948. The bill of exceptions was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Peck v. County CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Seifer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. Shank v. Union Central Life InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1942

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mayse v. Shannon Buick Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Ginn v. Trippett, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1952
  3. Worpel v. Board of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API