Legal Opinion

Gottesman v. Texas Petroleum Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 6, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MaeMAHON, District Judge.

This is a motion by the plaintiff, under Rule 39(b) F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., for an order directing trial by jury of the issues in the action notwithstanding the failure of plaintiff to make a timely demand for a jury trial as required by Rule 38(b).

There is no question that this action for damages for breach of contract is one in which a demand for a jury trial might have been made as of right. The sole ground asserted by plaintiff’s counsel as a basis for the exercise of the Court’s discretion to relieve plaintiff from the statutory waiver imposed by Rule 38(d),…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mason v. British Overseas Airways Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  2. Polak v. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N. V. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines HollandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  3. Second-79th St. Co. v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  4. Steiger v. MullaneyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cataldo v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  2. Transocean Air Lines v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  3. Leve v. General Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API