Gottesman v. Texas Petroleum Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MaeMAHON, District Judge.
This is a motion by the plaintiff, under Rule 39(b) F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., for an order directing trial by jury of the issues in the action notwithstanding the failure of plaintiff to make a timely demand for a jury trial as required by Rule 38(b).
There is no question that this action for damages for breach of contract is one in which a demand for a jury trial might have been made as of right. The sole ground asserted by plaintiff’s counsel as a basis for the exercise of the Court’s discretion to relieve plaintiff from the statutory waiver imposed by Rule 38(d),…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mason v. British Overseas Airways Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Polak v. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N. V. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines HollandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Second-79th St. Co. v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Steiger v. MullaneyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cataldo v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Transocean Air Lines v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Leve v. General Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965