Legal Opinion

Davis v. Rittenhouse & Embree Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 6, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Petition for a Mechanic's Lien.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edward F. Dunne, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 3900.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sears

We are of opinion that the claim of the Rittenhouse and Embree Company, one of appellees, to a mechanic’s lien, can not be sustained. The statute relied upon by this appellee to maintain its lien provides, by section 25, chapter 82, R. S., that the Sub-contractor must, within sixty days after completing work or furnishing materials, cause written notice of claim, or sub-contract, with copy thereof, if in writing, to be personally served on the owner, or his agent or architect,or superintendent in charge; and it also provides that such notice shall state the amount due or to become due to such…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Freeman v. RinakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Hurd v. GoodrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Campbell v. JacobsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Pennell v. Lamar InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Prince v. CutlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roth v. LehmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API