Legal Opinion

Puckett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 3, 1992No. 91-1204PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

W. SHARP, Judge.

Puckett appeals from an order entered by the trial judge refusing to disqualify himself from presiding over Puckett’s post-conviction relief motion. This is not an *327appealable order. Kowalski v. Boyles, 557 So.2d 885 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). We elect to treat this cause as a petition for writ of prohibition,1 and deny it on the merits.

Litigants have a right to seek the disqualification of a presiding judge when they have objective grounds to believe they will not receive a fair consideration at a trial or other judicial proceeding.2 In this case, the facts set forth in the motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Geisser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. Kowalski v. BoylesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Wilisch v. WilischDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Hope v. StateCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rainey v. RaineyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API