Puckett v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
W. SHARP, Judge.
Puckett appeals from an order entered by the trial judge refusing to disqualify himself from presiding over Puckett’s post-conviction relief motion. This is not an *327appealable order. Kowalski v. Boyles, 557 So.2d 885 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). We elect to treat this cause as a petition for writ of prohibition,1 and deny it on the merits.
Litigants have a right to seek the disqualification of a presiding judge when they have objective grounds to believe they will not receive a fair consideration at a trial or other judicial proceeding.2 In this case, the facts set forth in the motion…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Geisser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Kowalski v. BoylesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Wilisch v. WilischDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Hope v. StateCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rainey v. RaineyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997