Legal Opinion

United States v. East Half (E½) Section Twelve (12), Township Nineteen (19) North, Range Fifty-Five (55) West of 6th P.M., Banner County

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided February 5, 1990No. CV87-L-611PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DAVID L. PIESTER, United States Magistrate.

Pursuant to an order of this court, Phyllis Kappen (Phyllis) has filed a showing of cause why her motion to intervene should not be barred under Rule C(6) of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims. (Filing 35). The United States has filed a “request for determination,” filing 39, which is essentially a series of allegations that Phyllis’ showing is not adequate. For the reasons set forth below, I conclude that Phyllis has shown cause *173why her petition should not be barred by Rule C(6), and I shall grant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
Robinson v. HanrahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
United States v. Thirteen Thousand Dollars in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
Lehner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
United States v. South Half of Lot 7 & Lot 8Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

United States v. Real Property, Buildings, Appurtenances & Improvements Located at 221 Dana AvenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001