Smith v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, upon a jury verdict, of one count of burglary. Appellant Charles Rene Smith’s primary contention is that the district court erred in refusing his proffered jury instruction on the lesser crime of trespass. We hold that, under the elements test set forth in Blockburger v. United States,1 the crime of trespass is not a lesser-included offense of burglary. Therefore, we conclude that the district court did not err in refusing Smith’s requested instruction.
FACTS
On July 10, 2003, at approximately 11:00 p.m., the victim awoke to the noise of…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Gavieres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Lisby v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1966
- Garner v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1962
- Barton v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- Manning (Juan) v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Manning (Juan) v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Martin (Weslie) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2021
- Matthews v. NevenDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2017
- Strader (Kevin) v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.