Legal Opinion

Cox v. Chester

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Washtenaw. (Kinne, J.) Replevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

The plaintiff brought suit in replevin, in the ordinary form, to recover possession of certain cattle belonging to the plaintiff. The .defendant pleaded the general issue, and set up—

“ That said plaintiff's cattle broke into said defendant's inclosed lot, and damaged said defendant's crops to the amount of twenty dollars, for which said defendant asks judgment against said plaintiff, together with distraining fees and costs of suit.”

The plaintiff recovered before the justice, and defendant appealed. In the circuit the case was tried before a jury. Upon the trial the plaintiff introduced…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Campau v. KonanMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Marx v. WoodruffMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Donley v. FowlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Eklund v. TonerMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API