Legal Opinion

Van Derhoef v. Hartmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1901PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Charles R. Hartmann, from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Brooklyn, in favor of the plaintiff, upon the verdict of a jury, rendered by direction of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Hirschberg, J.:

The defendant hired from the plaintiff the premises No. 298 Clermont avenue, Brooklyn, for the period of one year, from August 15, 19G0, under a written sealed lease complete upon its face, and containing no covenant to repair. The rent was payable, on the first of each month. He defaulted in the rent which became due . November first, and on the trial of the action brought to recover the amount a verdict was directed in plaintiff’s favor.

The defendant sought to show upon the trial that prior to the execution of the lease, and as an inducement and consideration for it, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Eighmie v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Truscott v. . KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  4. Blewitt v. . BoorumNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Renard v. . SampsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1855

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Daly v. PizaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. Bristol Hotel Co. v. PegramAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906
  3. Brown v. DeGraffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  4. Daly v. PizaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904
  5. Leeming v. DuryeaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API