Legal Opinion
Kuriansky v. Natural Mold Shoe Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 6, 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*685OPINION OF THE COURT
Gerard E. Delaney, J.
This is a motion to renew and reargue pursuant to CPLR 2221. In light of the recent Court of Appeals decision in Morgenthau v Citisource, Inc. (68 NY2d 211 [1986]), the motion is granted.
This is a forfeiture action for the proceeds of a crime pursuant to CPLR article 13-A. Plaintiffs seek to expand the order of attachment against the criminal defendants to include any of the criminal defendants’ assets. This court’s previous decision was governed by the Appellate Division’s decision in Morgenthau v Citisource, Inc. (121 AD2d 353 [1986]), which held…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morgenthau v. Citisource, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Allen v. Commissioner of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Kuriansky v. Natural Mold Shoe Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1986
- Sunset Taxi Co. v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Morgenthau v. Citisource, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kuriansky v. Bed-Stuy Health Care Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Morgenthau v. CliffordNew York Supreme Court · 1992
- Dillon v. WoolnoughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994