Dukes v. Rogers
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
“As to a claim or demand by one partner against another, arising out of the partnership business, the statute of limitations does not in any event begin to run until after a dissolution of the partnership, and this is true although for a considerable period before dissolution the firm had not been actively engaged in the prosecution of its business but had placed its assets in the hands of an agent for the purpose of collecting the same and paying the partnership debts.” Harris v. Mathews, 107 Ga. 46 (32 S. E. 903). “After the dissolution of a partnership, the statute of limitations does not…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Currier v. StudleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Wilhelm v. CaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
- Dowse v. GaynorMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Christy v. FarlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Brooks v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dawes Mining Co. v. CallahanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980