Patterson v. Kasper
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Clinton; Searl, J. Assumpsit by Erford Patterson, by next friend, against Joseph Kasper and another. Judgment for defendants on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
The plaintiff, a minor, claims that he purchased from Joseph Kasper, a minor, and Tyler Georgia, an adult, a horse for $158, upon the representations of both of them that the horse was sound and all right. The horse turned out to be a vicious kicker, and when the plaintiff discovered this, he re*282turned the horse to the defendants and demanded the return of his money. The demand being refused, this suit was commenced to recover it. The declaration is in assumpsit, and contains a special count, and also the common counts. At the «conclusion of plaintiff’s case a verdict was directed for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rice v. BoyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Elwell v. MartinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1859
- Howe v. ClanceySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1865
- Shaw v. CoffinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1870
- Stoll v. HawksMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brown v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Hindmarsh v. Sulpho Saline Bath Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Scott v. BrazileTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Boshaw v. J. J. Newberry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Borger Independent School Dist. v. DicksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.