Legal Opinion

PAYNE v. STATE Ex Guitteau

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1928No. 2130PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

There is no question that the charter of the City of Toledo, which became effective January 1, 1916, requires the ordinances passed by the Council to be submitted to the Mayor for approval and gives him the veto power. We think it is obvious, however, that the city charter can not enlarge the provisions of the Constitution of Ohio with reference to ah amendment to such charter and that the matter is fully 'covered by that part of Section 9 of Article XVIII of the Constitution of Ohio which reads as follows:

“Amendments to any • charter framed and adopted as herein provided may be submitted to…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Billington v. CotnerOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Sloane v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  3. Merryman v. GormanJefferson County Court of Common Pleas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API