Legal Opinion

Smith v. Boyle

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1902No. 12,335PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the district court for- Kearney county. Action in the nature of trover. Tried below before Adams, J. Verdict for plaintiff in the sum of fl. Judgment on verdict. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Duffie, 0.

Tilomas Boyle, tlie defendant in error, rented certain premises from one Slater from August 7, 1897, to August 7, 1898. He continued in possession under this lease until August, 1900, Avhen Slater rented the premises to George P. Smith, the plaintiff in error. Fall wheat appears to have been the only crop grown on the rented premises. Boyle cut his last crop some time in July, 1900, and threshed the same about September 20, leaving the straw on the ground. Smith took possession under his lease some time in August or September, and Boyle claims that he converted the straw to his own…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Low v. ElwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Vilas v. MasonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sgro v. Getty Petroleum Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
  2. Opperman v. LittlejohnMississippi Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Bowe v. PalmerUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Edghill v. MankeyNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Towne v. SautterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API