Legal Opinion

In Re Lawnmower Engine Horsepower Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided August 12, 2008No. MDL 1971PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the entire Panel: Plaintiffs in all three actions have jointly moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings of this litigation in the District of New Jersey. All responding defendants agree that centralization is appropriate. Defendant MTD Products, Inc., supports centralization in the District of New Jersey, while the nine other responding defendants 1 suggest centralization in the Southern District of Illinois or, alternatively, the Northern District of Illinois.

This litigation presently…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Eli Lilly & Co.(cephalexin Monohydrate)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Lawnmower Engine Horsepower Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation (No. II)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API