Legal Opinion

Alaska Packers' Ass'n v. Gover

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1922No. 3705PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

Error is assigned to the denial of the defendant’s motion for an instructed verdict. It is contended that the motion should have been allowed for the reason that the ladder was a simple tool, and that the risk of injury from any defects therein was assumed by the plaintiff. Several cases are cited to the proposition that a ladder is a simple tool, and is in the class of tools with respect to which the master is not liable under the rule that where a tool is *88simple in construction and defects therein can be discovered without special skill or knowledge and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Lincoln v. PowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Phoenix Railway Co. v. LandisSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Pendegrass v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. O'Brien v. Northwestern Consolidated Milling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. McNeal v. OttoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API