Den Bleyker v. Gaston
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kalamazoo. (Buck, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinions.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
Plaintiff and one McNabb, doing business at Kalamazoo as the Peninsular Carriage Company, on February 28, 1890, entered into a written contract with Arthur B. and Frank D. Gaston, partners, doing business as the Gaston Lumber Company, by the terms of which the latter agreed to furnish, f. o. b. cars a.t Kalamazoo, at a stated price per foot, 500,000 feet of rock elm strips in sets, consisting of a given number of pieces of sizes and lengths prescribed, all to be strictly clear, sound, and tough timber. The purchasers-were given the option of varying the sizes at the same rate per foot. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Shepard v. Milwaukee Gas Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
- Houser v. PearceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- Hobbs v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ehrenworth v. . Stuhmer Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Sizer & Co. v. Melton & SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Orester v. Dayton Rubber Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Adam & SteinbruggeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- F. W. Kavanaugh Manufacturing Co. v. RosenMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.