Legal Opinion

Hill & Adams v. West

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 17, 1923No. 13768Published

1Per curiam

1. The petition was not subject to any ground, either general or special, of the demurrer.

2. The plea of res adjudicata was properly stricken. See West v. Hill & Adams, 23 Ga. App. 636 (99 S. E. 155).

3. No proper brief of evidence was transmitted to this court. What purports to be a brief of the oral evidence consists of twenty pages, containing many questions propounded to the witnesses and the answers thereto, and apparently all of the objections .made to the. admission or the exclusion of evidence and the rulings of the court thereon. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. West v. Hill & AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API