Legal Opinion

Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Local Union 524 v. Billington

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 28, 1968No. 22046PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge.

This is an action for specific performance of an arbitration clause in a collective bargaining agreement. The appeal raises the following question: Whether the employer was bound by the offer of a purported agent made to the union for a collective bargaining agreement which the union claims it accepted.1

The appellant, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Local 524 (hereafter the Union), commenced the action below against D. S. Billington, an individual doing business as Billington Builders Supply (hereafter Billington) and Billington Builders Supply,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Kuhn v. Princess Lida of Thurn & TaxisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  3. Home Indemnity Co. of New York v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  4. Lozano Enterprises v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  5. Wackenhut Corp. v. International Union, United Plant Guard Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ward King v. Laborers International Union of North America, Union Local No. 818Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Ralph Printing & Lithographing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  3. Certified Corporation, a Hawaii Corporation v. Hawaii Teamsters and Allied Workers, Local 996, IbtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. Casco Indemnity Co. v. Rhode Island Interlocal Risk Management TrustCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. International Union of Elevator Constructors, Local No. 8, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API