Legal Opinion

Kimbrough v. Smith

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1947No. 36254PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberds, J.

The question presented on this appeal is whether the county Judge, who sat as judge and jury, had sufficient evidence before him to find and conclude that Smith impliedly agreed to pay Kimbrough a real-estate commission. He did so conclude and entered judgment for Kimbrough for $337.50. The Circuit Judge, on appeal to that court, on a review of the record from the County Court, reversed it, and entered a judgment for Smith, from which Kimbrough appeals here.

A decision of the foregoing question makes it necessary that we review the evidence.

Kimbrough had effected a sale of real property from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ellis v. S. Pellegrini, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Segnitz v. A. Grossenbach Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Ham & Ham Lead & Zinc Investment Co. v. Catherine Lead Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1917

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Henry S. Bloomgarden v. Charles B. CoyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. Carmichael v. Agur Realty Co., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. International Harvester Co. v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Hill v. CappsMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Jones v. Index Drilling Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API