Legal Opinion

Woodruff v. McMillan

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1988No. WD 39748PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COVINGTON, Judge.

Stephen and Randy Woodruff appeal from the trial court’s grant of a motion for summary judgment in favor of Clayton and Katherine Elizabeth McMillan, who alleged that the Woodruffs’ action constituted a compulsory counterclaim and was barred by Rule 55.32(a). The judgment is affirmed.

In 1979, Stanley and Elizabeth Woodruff purchased a large tract of farmland from Clayton and Katherine McMillan. The McMillans carried a large portion of the purchase price by a promissory note which was executed by Stanley and Elizabeth Woodruff and secured by a deed of trust. Stanley and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. J.E. Dunn, Jr. & Associates, Inc. v. SchoenlaubSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. Knight v. M.H. Siegfried Real Estate, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Myers v. Clayco State BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Chapman v. Auto-Owners (Mutual) Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beasley v. MironuckMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Wamsganz v. Washington County Mercantile BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Port v. Maple Tree Investments, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Presson v. PressonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API