Legal Opinion

People v. Williams

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

*631Defendant argues that his 1973 reformatory sentence could not serve as a predicate for a persistent felony offender sentence because Penal Law § 70.10 (1) (b) (i) defines a previous felony conviction as one for which "a sentence to a term of imprisonment in excess of one year * * * was imposed”, and Penal Law former § 75.00 (2) (which was not repealed until 1974) defined a reformatory sentence as "a sentence to imprisonment for a period of unspecified duration”. He points to the Staff Notes of the Temporary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. In re Lorie C.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Anderson v. ReganNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. People v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. KnappAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. People v. KnightNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. KnightNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API