Legal Opinion

People v. Toneff

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1971No. Docket 10182PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was found guilty by. a jury of breaking and entering with intent to commit a larceny. MCLA § 750.110 (Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 28.305). Defendant appeals and asserts that reversible error resulted from (1) the failure of the prosecutor to indorse on the information and call two accomplices and (2) the trial court’s admission of a statement made by defendant to the police.

Although the prosecutor is under a general obligation to indorse and call as witnesses all noncumulative res gestae witnesses, this duty does not extend to the calling of accomplices. People v. Virgil Brown (1969),…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. HummelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. People v. Virgil BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. People v. Leroy MorganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. People v. MooreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. McGillenMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. GilbertMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. HendersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. People v. GilbertMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. People v. MitchellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API