Legal Opinion

ELLIOT & CALLAN, INC. v. Crofton

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 30, 2009No. 07-CV-3391(PJS/JJG)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge.

Plaintiff Elliot & Callan, Inc. (“E & C”) brings suit against defendant Luther Allan Crofton under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“UFTA”), Minn.Stat. § 513.41 et seq. E & C’s claim was tried to the Court on July 15 and July 17, 2008. Having heard the evidence and the arguments of counsel, and having worked its way through the voluminous financial documents introduced into evidence at trial, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a).

I. FINDINGS OF FACT

A.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Southmark Corporation, Debtor. Southmark Corporation v. Schulte Roth & ZabelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. In Re: Jones Truck Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  3. Snyder Electric Co. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. In Re: Dorholt, Inc., Debtor. Dwight R.J. Lindquist, Trustee v. Marjorie DorholtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  5. Velde v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stoebner v. Ritchie Capital Management, L.L.C. (In re Polaroid Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  2. Responsible Person of Musicland Holding Corp. v. Best Buy Co. (In re Musicland Holding Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API