Canoe Creek Coal Co. v. Christinson
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
. In Equity. Suit by the Canoe Creek Coal Company against Stewart Christinson arid others. Proceedings for contempt against S- C. Sandefur and Letcher Martin. On question of right to jury trial.
1Opinion of the Court
WALTER EVANS, District Judge.
[1] In endeavoring to reach a conclusion as to the proper punishment to be imposed upon the defendants,- S. C. Sandefur and Letcher Martin, for the violation by them severally of the order of injunction entered herein on the 27th -of January, 1922, the court has carefully analyzed the plaintiff’s bill of complaint in order to ascertain whether or not it is based upon the provisions of the act entitled “An act to supplement existing laws against unlawful restraints of monopolies, and for other purposes” (38 Stats. 730-740), usually called the Clayton Act, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Aldridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Forrest v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brady v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- McGibbony v. LancasterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
- Bull v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage EmployeesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- In re AtchisonDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1922
- Brady v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.