Hebel v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
CASANUEVA, Judge.
Richard M. Hebei appeals his conviction for sexual battery of his then spouse, P.H.C., contending that the trial court allowed the introduction of irrelevant, prejudicial evidence and precluded permissible cross-examination of the complainant. We agree that the court committed reversible error and remand for a new trial.
I. INTRODUCTION
The events of May 16,1998, are disputed by the parties. P.H.C. testified that, after failing to rape her, Mr. Hebei struck her with a flashlight and then forced the flashlight into her vagina. Mr. Hebei denounced the allegations as “absolutely…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Heuring v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Zack v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Bryan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Sexton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- People of Guam v. Paris Christian Reyes SharpeSupreme Court of Guam · 2024
- GARY TIMOTHY KITCHINGS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
- JOSE REYNA v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020