Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re Sony BMG Music Entertainment

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 16, 2009No. 09-1090Published

1ConcurrenceLipez, Circuit Judge

For the reasons set forth so clearly in Judge Selya’s opinion, I agree with my *11colleagues that the district court palpably erred in its application of Local Rule 83.3 of the District of Massachusetts to the request of respondent Tenenbaum that Courtroom View Network be permitted to webcast the non-evidentiary motions hearing that was scheduled for January 22, 2009. Given the language of the rule, and the unmistakable grounding of that language in a policy adopted by the Judicial Conference of the United States, that request should have been denied.

However, this inescapable legal conclusion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Siedle v. Putnam Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  2. In Re Providence Journal Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  3. Hamilton v. Accu-TekDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  4. Capitol Records, Inc. v. AlaujanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API