Dixon v. Risley
California Supreme Court
Writ of mandate from the Supreme Court to the Superior Court of Fresno County. E. W. Eisley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This is an application for a writ of mandate to require the superior court of the county of Fresno to allow plaintiff in a certain action there pending, to amend his complaint and to proceed with the trial.
H. S. Dixon, in April, 1891, commenced an action in the superior court of Fresno county to foreclose a mortgage. After the commencement of the action plaintiff became insane, and J. R. Dixon was appointed guardian for him. An amended complaint was then filed, in which J. R. Dixon, as guardian of H. S. Dixon, was plaintiff. The defendants appeared and answered, and the case was tried with…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Marr v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Harris v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Byrum v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Odlum v. DuffyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Odlum v. DuffyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950