Legal Opinion

City of Marseilles v. Radke

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 30, 1999No. 3-98-0518PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Homer

On remand from this court, the trial court determined that a condemned easement fell within the boundaries of a tax increment financing district created by the City of Marseilles. Thus, the trial court reconfirmed that it had subject-matter jurisdiction to approve a consent judgment that resolved the parties’ dispute over the easement. After our careful review, we affirm.

FACTS

The City of Marseilles (city) adopted an ordinance creating a real property tax increment financing district (TIF district) and an attendant redevelopment plan pursuant to the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Village of Worth v. IhdeIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. City of Marseilles v. RadkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. Village of Arlington Heights v. City of Prospect HeightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Henry County Board v. Village of OrionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. Flynn v. CohnIllinois Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Board of Education, Pleasantdale School District No. 107 v. Village of Burr RidgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  2. Robrock v. County of PiattAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  3. Robrock v. COUNTY OF PIATTAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  4. Nelson v. Quarles & Brady LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  5. Nelson v. Quarles & Brady, LLPAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API