City of Marseilles v. Radke
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Homer
On remand from this court, the trial court determined that a condemned easement fell within the boundaries of a tax increment financing district created by the City of Marseilles. Thus, the trial court reconfirmed that it had subject-matter jurisdiction to approve a consent judgment that resolved the parties’ dispute over the easement. After our careful review, we affirm.
FACTS
The City of Marseilles (city) adopted an ordinance creating a real property tax increment financing district (TIF district) and an attendant redevelopment plan pursuant to the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Village of Worth v. IhdeIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
- City of Marseilles v. RadkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Village of Arlington Heights v. City of Prospect HeightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Henry County Board v. Village of OrionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Flynn v. CohnIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Board of Education, Pleasantdale School District No. 107 v. Village of Burr RidgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Robrock v. County of PiattAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Robrock v. COUNTY OF PIATTAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Nelson v. Quarles & Brady LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
- Nelson v. Quarles & Brady, LLPAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019