Legal Opinion

Royale Marketing, Inc. v. Bender

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 2000No. ED 75665PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GARYM. GAERTNER, Presiding Judge.

Appellants, Royale Marketing, Inc., and Martin Silk, (“appellants”), appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County’s judgment awarding respondent, Ruth Bender, (“respondent”), $16,886 in attorney’s fees. We affirm.

The parties entered into a consent decree settling their dispute. The settlement order, dated August 12, 1998, stated respondent’s motion for attorney’s fees would be heard on September 14, 1998. The trial court’s minutes indicate respondent’s motion for attorney’s fees was heard and submitted on that day. On September 18, 1998, the trial court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Rowe v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. A.W. Moore Roofing & General Construction, Inc. v. SevierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Walter D. Combs v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API