Legal Opinion

PDV (USA), Inc. v. Cobrin

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Louis B. York, J.

This motion for a substitution of Peter Cobrin by Toby Cobrin, the executor of his estate, is granted. The cross motion to vacate the decision dismissing the second and fourth causes of action against all of the defendants is denied.

It is true that the death of a party to the action will generally stay any further activities in the case until there is a substitution of a representative of the estate for the deceased party. Any activity before such an appointment is a nullity (Chimenti v *938Hertz Corp., 25 AD2d 562 [2d Dept 1966]). The question here is what…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Faraone v. National Academy of Television Arts & SciencesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Cocozzelli, Lerner, Meunkle & Grossman, L. L. P. v. BasileAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Chimenti v. Hertz Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  4. Rattray v. RaynorNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Kaye v. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API