Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals v. Gunn
Indiana Court of Appeals
1DissentConover, Judge
I respectfully dissent. The majority has misconstrued the statute at issue herein. The trial court correctly interpreted IND. ~CODE 14-3-3.2-2 as limiting single family dwellings within the historic preservation district to occupancy by only one family. The majority states this language appears to be in conflict with IC 16-10-2.1-6.5 which prohibits exclusion of residential facilities based on lack of a family relationship between the residents. I see no conflict, however.
IC 16-10-2.1-6.5 refers to zoning ordinances adopted under IC 18-7(86-7). This statute, however, deals with local…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Higgins v. HaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Indiana State Highway Commission v. Bates & Rogers Construction, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. SouderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983