Campbell v. Young
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 11-PETITION ORDINARY- APPEAL EKOM ADAIR CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Code, section 142. 2 M. & B., Statute of 1801, p. 1275. 6 Vermont, 219. 6 Bingham, 603. 1 Stanton’s Revised Statutes, p. 400. 6 Bush, 185, Prather v. Harlan & Thompson’s adm’r. 4 Dana, 381, Steele v. Curie. 17 B. Mon. 245, Lindsey v. Rutherford. 12 B. Mon. 537, Ray, &c. v. Catlett & Buck 14 B. Mon. 232, Slade v. Arnold. 14 B. Mon. 337, Murphy v. Simpson. 10 Mass. 317, Green v. Putnam.
Read the full summary
Case 11-PETITION ORDINARY- APPEAL EKOM ADAIR CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Code, section 142. 2 M. & B., Statute of 1801, p. 1275. 6 Vermont, 219. 6 Bingham, 603. 1 Stanton’s Revised Statutes, p. 400. 6 Bush, 185, Prather v. Harlan & Thompson’s adm’r. 4 Dana, 381, Steele v. Curie. 17 B. Mon. 245, Lindsey v. Rutherford. 12 B. Mon. 537, Ray, &c. v. Catlett & Buck 14 B. Mon. 232, Slade v. Arnold. 14 B. Mon. 337, Murphy v. Simpson. 10 Mass. 317, Green v. Putnam. CITED 1 Stanton’s Revised Statutes, p. 400. 12 B. Mon. 533, Ray v. Catlett & Buck 14 B. Mon. 232, Slade v. Arnold. 14 B. Mon. 337, Murphy v.…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE PETERS
delivered the opinion oe the court.
To an action brought by appellant against appellee and one Dillingham on two notes, bearing date the 2d day of September, 1865, Young, after stating in an answer to an amended petition that the larger note was given for money loaned by appellant to Dillingham, and that the smaller one was for usurious interest demanded for the use of the money loaned, and that he signed both of the notes as the surety only of Dillingham, alleges that the notes do not bear the true date of their execution, but that they were, in fact, executed on the 3d day of…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Hofgesang v. SilverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Hofgesang v. SilverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928