Legal Opinion

State v. Girard

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 19, 2017No. 15CR44876; A161121PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for second-degree escape, ORS 162.155.1 The trial court entered that judgment after finding defendant guilty as charged on two counts of second-degree escape, which the court determined should merge. She assigns error to the trial court’s denial of her request for entry of judgment of acquittal as to each count, contending that, when ORS 162.155 is correctly construed, the evidence is not sufficient to sustain her conviction. For the following reasons, we conclude that defendant was entitled to entry of a judgment of acquittal as to Count 1, but…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. LinkOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. LaneOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. GirardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API