Legal Opinion · Dissent

Heller v. Amawalk Nursery, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 21, 1938Published

1DissentTaylor, J.

I agree with the majority that there should be struck from the judgments appealed from the provision in respondents’ favor for a stay of proceedings. Such stay is unwarranted in view of the undoubted right of the mortgagees, because of impressive defaults, to resort to the mortgaged real estate. Even pending appeal, such stay would be in order only upon security given. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 598.)

Upon the main question as to the rights of the appellants, mortgagees, in the nursery stock, I am of opinion that until the delivery to them of the referee’s deed in this foreclosure, if they shall…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holmes v. GravenhorstNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Duffus v. . BangsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Hamilton v. . AustinNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. In re Pennsylvania Nursery Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API