Legal Opinion

Napodensky v. West Jersey & Seashore Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 17, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On appeal from the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*337The opinion of flie court was delivered by

Minturn, J.

While driving a horse that he hired from the plaintiff, Jacob Shapiro, which was hitched to. an open wagon, across the tracks of defendant’s railroad on Lincoln avenue, in Woodbine, Max Mapodensky, the other plaintiff, a man about seventy years of age, was struck by a train; the horse was killed; the wagon destroyed, and the plaintiff was injured for which loss and injury these two suits were instituted against the defendant by the respective plaintiffs and a verdict obtained in each suit.

The track was single, and there was an electric…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Annaker v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. Kingsley v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  3. Goodenough v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  4. McCool v. West Jersey & Seashore RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stewart v. NortonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API