Legal Opinion
Horn v. City of Chicago
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 21, 1988No. Nos. 87-1174, 87-1175 and 87-1936PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs1 are 330,000 motor vehicle owners who paid delinquent parking tickets *701pursuant to demand notices processed by Datacom for the City of Chicago. The district court held that the demand notices violated plaintiffs’ right to due process of law by failing to give sufficient notice that a hearing was available to contest their liability for the amount demanded. The court therefore ordered the City to provide a hearing on the parking violation and fine for any plaintiff who so desired. We hold that as a matter of law the demand notices provided constitutionally…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- National Presto Industries, Inc. v. The West Bend Company, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Kowalski v. BolikerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- People Ex Rel. Daley v. Datacom Systems Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
- La Preferida, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. De C v. a Mexican CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.