Newell v. Southern Jitney Jungle Co.
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
830 So.2d 621 (2002)
Kay L. NEWELL (Roderick)
v.
SOUTHERN JITNEY JUNGLE COMPANY d/b/a Sack and Save.
No. 1999-CA-00024-SCT.
Supreme Court of Mississippi.
October 31, 2002.
Samuel E. Farris, Jonathan Michael Farris, Hattiesburg, attorneys for appellant.
J. Robert Ramsay, Hattiesburg, attorney for appellee.
EN BANC.
SMITH, P.J., for the Court.
¶ 1. The issue in the present case is whether Kay L. Newell has stated sufficient grounds to sustain a negligence claim against Southern Jitney Jungle Stores of America d/b/a Sack and Save. We hold that the Workers' Compensation Law, Miss.Code Ann. §§ 71-3-1 to -129…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lyle v. MladinichMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- Grisham v. JOHN Q. LONG VFW POST, NO. 4057, INC.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Crain v. Cleveland Lodge 1532, Order of Moose, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- TM v. NoblittMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- Lang v. Bay St. Louis/Waveland School DistrictMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Simpson v. BoydMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
- Hurdle v. HollowayMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
- Titus v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
- Thomas v. Columbia Group, LLCMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
- Causey v. SandersMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.