Legal Opinion

Firkin v. U.S. Polychemical Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 2, 1993No. 91 C 3660PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ZAGEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff Max Firkin filed a complaint sounding in negligence and strict liability against LaBelle. The defendant, LaBelle Printing, moves for summary judgment on all counts, contending it is the wrong defendant. Alternatively, LaBelle seeks summary judgment on the strict liability count, claiming it provided a service, not a product.

I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD

Summary judgment is appropriate if “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and ... the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). “In…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. International Administrators, Inc. And Sheldon Harrison v. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Connelly v. Uniroyal, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Bartman v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Rawlings v. D. M. Oliver, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carter Enterprises, Inc. v. Ashland Specialty Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2001
  2. Ruiz v. Weiler & Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API