Legal Opinion

Engaard v. Schmidt

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1919No. 20402PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Kearney county: William C. Dorsey, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtDean, J.

This is an action to foreclose a real estate mortgage on three town lots in Minden. Defendant is a married man. His wife did not join in the execution of the mortgage. The court granted a decree as to lot 1, because it was not a part of defendant’s homestead. From that part of the decree denying relief as to lots 2 and 3 on the ground that such lots with their appurtenances constitute defendant’s homestead, plaintiff appealed.

The homestead was of less value than $2,000. The two lots in question here were apparently bought by defendant and deeds delivered in March and July, 1905. He borrowed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carey v. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Rodman v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  3. Griffin v. Proctor's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aldea y Díaz v. Tomás y PiñánSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1937
  2. Aldea y Díaz v. Tomás y PiñáSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1937
  3. Betancourt Hernández v. GonzálezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1939
  4. Betancourt Hernández v. González Vda. de PierasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API