Legal Opinion
Finjan, Inc. v. Bitdefender Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 8, 2019No. 4:17-cv-04790Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FINJAN, INC., Case No. 17-cv-04790-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND 9 v. ANSWER AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO SEAL 10 BITDEFENDER INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 126, 127, 133 11 Defendants. 12 On August 16, 2017, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) filed its complaint against Defendants 13 Bitdefender Inc., and Bitdefender S.R.L. (collectively, “Bitdefender”). Dkt. No. 1. Bitdefender 14 filed its answer and counterclaims on November 22, 2017. Dkt. No. 25. Bitdefender filed a first 15…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'NCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Phillips v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.