Cardozo v. Middle Atlantic Immigration Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Law and Equity Court of the city of Richmond in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the plaintiff:. Defendant assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.
The judgment to which this writ of error was awarded is in favor of the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error for commissions on a sale of a certain tract of land situated in Powhatan and Cumberland counties, *344known as the “Cocke” or “Oakland” tract, to oneM. P. Casto, a citizen and resident of the State of Kansas.
Defendant in error (plaintiff below) is a Virginia corporation engaged in the sale of real estate, and in its declaration in this action, which is in assumpsit, bases its right of recovery of the plaintiff in error (defendant below) of the sum of $2,500, with interest,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Belmont v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
- Francis v. ClineSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
- Beury v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rowland v. KableSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
- Hancock v. AndersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
- Williams v. BollingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- Silver v. LogueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Bassick v. Ætna Explosives Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.