Legal Opinion

Steelsmith v. Trout

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2003No. Nos. 28472, 28473Published

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

This is a contest involving the will of Laurence Steelsmith (the Testator). A dispute involving the interpretation of a conditional bequest has arisen between Clarence Steel-smith (Steelsmith) and James “Butch” Trout (Trout). Clarence is the Testator’s brother, business partner, and personal representative of the Testator’s estate. Trout is the Testator’s cousin and beneficiary under the Testator’s will. The dispute involves the interpretation of a provision in the Testator’s will that bequeaths 98% of his interest in the Steelsmith Brothers partnership to Trout on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Western Heritage Insurance v. GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Matter of Estate of HowardIdaho Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API