Legal Opinion

Bay View Towers Apartments, Inc. v. State Tax Commission

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1976PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Judgment of the Appellate Division affirmed, with costs. Applicable precedents establish that a mere substitution of one mortgage agreement for another, even in combination with a change of mortgagors, is insufficient to create a new mortgage for purposes of section 253 of the Tax Law (People ex rel. Banner Land Co. v State Tax Comm., 244 NY 159, esp 162-163; Matter of Suffolk County Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. v Bragalini, 5 NY2d 579, 583, 585). People ex rel. Williamsburgh Sav. Bank v State Tax Comm. (245 NY 414, 418) is distinguishable: there the new mortgage agreements explicitly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Banner Land Co. v. State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. People Ex Rel. Williamsburgh Savings Bank v. State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Suffolk County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BragaliniNew York Court of Appeals · 1959

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stevens Medical Arts Building v. City of Mount VernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Long Island Lighting Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation & FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Wetzler v. Roosevelt Raceway, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Citibank, N. A. v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. City of New York v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API