Lawyers' Title Guaranty Fund v. Sanders
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentDoolin, Justice
While I agree with the majority the principle of equitable subrogation by operation of law certainly exists and is applicable to an insurer who has paid a loss; it is not applicable under the facts and circumstances here. I therefore dissent.
Buyers’ attorney neglected to make a requirement regarding a second mortgage existing on the property. After the purchase, buyers paid off the second mortgage. Buyers then made a claim against the errant attorney for malpractice. The attorney’s malpractice insurance carriers (insurers) paid the buyers’ malpractice claim.
As the majority points out there…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sutton v. JondahlCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- International Insurance Co. v. Medical-Professional Building of Corpus ChristiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a Corporation v. First National Bank and Trust Company of Tulsa, Okl., a National Banking AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
- Jorski Mill & Elevator Co., Inc., and Millers Mutual Insurance Association of Illinois v. Farmers Elevator Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- General Creditors of the Estate of Harris v. CornettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.