Legal Opinion

Rampino v.Shaffren

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*885The defendants met their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff Robert S. Rampino did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). Rampino alleged, inter alia, that as a result of the subject accident, he sustained injuries to the cervical and lumbosacral regions of his spine. On the motion for summary judgment, the defendants submitted evidence establishing, among other things, prima facie, that the alleged injuries…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Perl v. MeherNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Rodriguez v. HuerfanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Hightower v. GhioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kearney v. GarrettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API