Legal Opinion

Tompkins v. Deyerle

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 14, 1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Montgomery county, in the chancery suit of Norcross v. Davis and Others, in which appellant was appointed a receiver to collect certain bonds given for deferred payments of real estate sold under decree in said’ cause. The decision of the Circuit Court being adverse to the receiver, he appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

At the May term, 1884, of the Circuit Court for Montgomery county, a decree was entered in the case of Northeross v. Davis" Heirs, directing James C. Taylor and George G. Junkin, who were appointed commissioners for the purpose, to sell certain real estate, and providing that either or both of them might act, but before doing so they should execute bond in the penalty of five hundred dollars, conditioned as the law directs. They advertised the land directed to be sold, appending to their advertisement of sale the clerk’s certificate that the bond required had been given. One parcel of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pulliam v. TompkinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sandrowski v. SandrowskiMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API