United States v. Carl Eugene Stephens, Opinion
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge PREGERSON; Dissent by Judge SNEED.
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Carl Eugene Stephens appeals his conviction for possession with intent to dis*916tribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Stephens contends that the cocaine was discovered as a result of police conduct in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The district court admitted evidence of cocaine found in Stephens’s bag over Stephens’s motion to suppress. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and we reverse.
I
On September 19, 1997, defendant Carl Eugene Stephens was traveling by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Remigio CHAN-JIMENEZ, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Roger NordlingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Robert Anthony GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Joseph N. BasinskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- State v. GraysonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- United States v. Ezra GriffithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Quentin FerebeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- State v. LisenbeeNevada Supreme Court · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.