Legal Opinion

Closson v. Bligh

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 8, 1908No. 5,984PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Prom Cass Circuit Court; John S. Lairy, Judge. Action by Seymour M. Closson against Martin J. Bligh. Prom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

Appellant by complaint in one paragraph charged appellee and George P. Chase with the execution of a certain promissorj'- note calling for $150, payable to the order of appellant six months after December 3, 1898. To this complaint appellee filed an answer of non est factum, and also an answer in denial. Chase did not appear to the action, nor was any notice of the action served upon him. The issue thus formed was submitted to a jury, and a verdict returned for appellee, and over appellant’s motion for a new trial judgment was rendered on the verdict.

The only error here assigned is the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. The People v. . HoveyNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. OhleSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Combs v. Union Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Robinson v. WoodfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Huston v. SchindlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Columbia Grocery Co. v. Schlesinger, Admr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API