Legal Opinion

Ruth v. Department of Legal Affairs

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 27, 1996No. 86872PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

684 So.2d 181 (1996)

Stephen L. RUTH, etc., et al., Petitioners,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, Respondent.

No. 86872.

Supreme Court of Florida.

November 27, 1996.

Wofford H. Stidham and Jonathan Stidham of Lane, Trohn, Clarke, Bertrand, Vreeland & Jacobsen, P.A., Bartow, for Petitioners.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Jeanne Clougher, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Respondent.

KOGAN, Chief Justice.

We have for review Ruth v. State, Department of Legal Affairs, 661 So.2d 901 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), wherein the district court certified the following questions to be of great public…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. United States v. Rex C. Cauble, Individually and Doing Business as Cauble EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Karl R. HuberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  4. Department of Law Enf. v. Real PropertySupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  5. United States v. Robert J. L'hoste, R. J. L'Hoste & Company, Inc., Clarence Eugene Rogers and Marvin Cochran, in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State Department of Human Resources v. R.E.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. City of Hollywood v. MulliganSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  3. Burgese v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  4. Gilliam v. SmartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. Hammond v. DSY DEVELOPERS, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API