Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Lynn

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1996Published

1DissentDrowota, Justice

I agree with the majority that the clerk erred in this case by failing to choose the special venire in accordance with Tenn.Code Ann. § 22-2-308(a)(2); I also agree that the clerk erred by failing to publish the names of the venire in accordance with Tenn.Code Ann. § 22-2-306(b). I cannot agree, however, with the majority’s conclusion that these errors require reversal of the defendant’s conviction. Therefore, I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion.

As noted by the majority, it is undisputed that defense counsel, on November 16, 1992, filed a motion challenging the procedures by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Norris v. RichardsTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Gentry v. Betty Lou BakeriesTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Pickard v. FerrellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
  4. Howard Sober, Inc. v. ClementCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API